Which is perfectly fine. You don't test a version, then fix something and immediately put it on the stable branch. Every stable version needs to spend time as beta test version beforehand. If you change even one single thing, you have to test it again.
Originally Posted by Frederf
So? That's how it has always worked since forever. That's the right way to do it.
Of course. My apologies. I've forgotten that ED treats us as both the beta tester and the customer.
Originally Posted by Sobek
Which is perfectly fine. You don't test a version, then fix something and immediately put it on the stable branch. Every stable version needs to spend time as beta test version beforehand.
Except there was no stable branch, there was only open beta.
Originally Posted by Sobek
If you change even one single thing, you have to test it again.
Where was this logic when you were trying to make excuses as to how the memory leak issue slipped in?
