I’ll be seeing it in the theater this coming weekend.
So, PM, did you like it?
We didn’t get to go since my wife had to work. Ah the vagaries of having a spouse who works as a pharmacy manager at a major hospital……
Hopefully this weekend will work out.
Last edited by PanzerMeyer; 04/09/2610:40 AM.
“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”
Now watching Perry Mason movie series made starting in 1930s -- first movie 1934, second 1935. Finished first two movies.
A very different Perry Mason from the TV series I've watched end-to-end 4+ times (271 episodes each time). Example: Perry has a LARGE law firm with multiple Lawyers and many staff members working for him. Example: Perry "cuts corners" relative to the law to save his innocent clients from Execution. It is believable.
The first 4 had issues. They got sillier and sillier. The actors were not ideal for their roles -- so, there were changes along the way. The face of the Perry Mason actor was okay -- but, his actions weren't.
In the 5th episode they made dramatic changes to the actors, actions, and maturity of the movie. It was much like the TV Perry Mason with Raymond Burr. However, the actor who played Perry did not have the "right face" for the part. Moreover, his sidekicks were miscast "facially" -- they just did not inspire confidence.
In the 6th episode, they changed the cast again. And, the action was more "Perry Mason like". However, the new Perry and some supporting cast were not "facially right".
All in all: Not a recommended series -- except to folks like me who are currently paying attention to Movie history and casting. These are not "Perry Mason" -- though to repeat, the last 2 movies came closer.
Always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Elie Wiesel. Romanian born Jewish writer, professor, political activist, Nobel Laureate, Holocaust survivor. 1928 - 2016.
Indeed the safest road to Hell is the gradual one - the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts. C.S. Lewis, 1898 - 1963.
Always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Elie Wiesel. Romanian born Jewish writer, professor, political activist, Nobel Laureate, Holocaust survivor. 1928 - 2016.
Indeed the safest road to Hell is the gradual one - the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts. C.S. Lewis, 1898 - 1963.
The Hound of the Baskervilles Drama•Suspense•Suspenseful 3.4/5 IMDb 6.5/10 2003 1 h 30 min A captivating 21st-century version of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's chilling masterpiece. The legendary Sherlock Holmes and dynamic Dr Watson grapple with an adversary that threatens to overwhelm them on the forbidding moors of England. As Holmes investigates the mystery of Sir Charles Baskerville's recent death, events spiral out of control. Is his adversary human or occult? Creators and Cast
Directors David Attwood
Producers Christopher Hall, Greg Brenman, Allan Cubitt, Gareth Neame
Cast Richard Roxburgh, Ian Hart, Richard E Grant, Matt Day
Studio BBC Studios
Watched it on the Amazon site (free). A 2003 version of the story -- set in the 1890s era.
Good cast -- Sherlock and his Genius Opponent looked every bit the part (in fact, their Genius appearances came up in a conversation -- so it wasn't an accident in casting). Watson's actor was not ideal for the role -- looked too young and brainless -- acted okay. Other actors/actresses were good casting. Very good/appropriate settings. Hit the main points of the original story line and added some stuff.
Note the reviews are 3.4 out of 5. I agree. It had moments. But, the 3 or 4 other "The Hound of the Baskervilles" I've seen were slightly better.
Maybe if I'd not seen the others, I'd have given this version more "points" -- mentally because I did not actually "vote".
I’m sure people here guessed that from your animated profile pic. Do you want to go on a date with her?
“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”
I’m sure people here guessed that from your animated profile pic. Do you want to go on a date with her?
She is married, you Silly Panzer.
That doesn’t prevent you from fantasizing about going on a date with her.
“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”
HEARTCharlize as an actress but in her real life, she has become one of those many celebrities f up by Hollywood's agenda of putting mental illness on the pedestal
It's perfectly natural human reaction to admit you have.
Human emotion is what set us apart and above from animals.
-----
I just find it awkward that a grown adult man has an animated pic of Ana Taylor Joy as their profile pic on a message board. That's something you would expect from a teenage girl.
“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”
Huh? I was referring to the fact that you would expect teenage girls to use animated pics of Ana Taylor Joy. You've failed Reading Comprehension 101.
“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”