|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 481
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 481 |
Thank Hpasp! Video just fine , so if this was a simulator like this video. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 481
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 481 |
It's just super that someone delves into the details.
Thank you for this Piston79 Analysis of Dvina !
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,046
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,046 |
Guys, let's hunt it! 13:45 19th of December, 1972. SR-71 bomb damage assessment flight number one. SA-75M Dvina 41:35, V-750VMVK 11DMVK Missile launched on Channel-1 Target distance: 35km Target azimuth: 182� Target elevation: 18� Target altitude: 11,1km SNR mode: 110km Missile guidance method: K (Half Lead Elevated By Constans) 41:41, V-750VMVK 11DMVK Missile launched on Channel-2 Target distance: 35km Target azimuth: 181� Target elevation: 19� Target altitude: 11,9km SNR mode: 110km Missile guidance method: K (Half Lead Elevated By Constans) 41:49, V-750VMVK 11DMVK Missile launched on Channel-3 Target distance: 35km Target azimuth: 180� Target elevation: 21� Target altitude: 13km SNR mode: 110km Missile guidance method: K (Half Lead Elevated By Constans) 42:37, Missile exploded on Channel-3
SR-71 Habu hit by SAM. (miss distance: 227m)Total, SNR On Air Time: 2min 31sec  
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,841
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,841 |
Nice shot there Piston! Despite that SR-71 wasn't shot down, hitting it was nevertheless a great feat Maybe next time you will manage to hit a missile at a distance less than 100 meters and thus shooting it down.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 481
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 481 |
Simply Super piston 79! Piston 79 at all expert on shooting, I think. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,046
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,046 |
Target real altitude - 24.0 km sin 18� = 0.309016994 10.6/34 = 0.3117647 if take sin - 24.0/0.309016994 = 77.665 km if take altitude/distance - 24.0/0.3117647 = 76.98 km Which is real, God knows...  (in fact we should use data from third launch, but anyway, still have a difference)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 481
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 481 |
Yes it's true I do so determined by the height / distance Piston79 just super!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 481
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 481 |
Here I am playing Dvina found something else interesting. At the test site Ashuluk simulation EA-6 showing the height of the target for H = 1200 m But in the simulator showing the height of 5 km as possible?   
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665 |
Some addition of "hacking method K"... This guidance method is simply UPR, just adding a Constant "K" into elevation, depending the distance of the missile to the range boresight. If the missile - boresight distance is larger than 10km, it adds 1.2 degree to the elevation boresight. From 10km, it gradually reduces this Constant to 0 degree. (at 5km it is 0.6 degree) So if you want to add 0.6degree elevation at the impact point, to compensate the missile overload capability limitation, than just move the range boresight to the calculated impact distance plus 5km.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665 |
Here I am playing Dvina found something else interesting.
At the test site Ashuluk simulation EA-6 showing the height of the target for H = 1200 m
But in the simulator showing the height of 5 km as possible?It should fly at 5km altitude. I will correct the label.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665 |
Warning, please practice strict emission control... ... or you will face this: 2:00am 15th of April, 1986.
Operation El-Dorado Canyon raid against Benghazi.
Targets:
Jamahiriyah barracks - 6 A-6E Intruder (VA-34 Blue Blasters from the CV-66 USS America)
Benghazi AFB - 6 A-6E Intruder (VA-34 Blue Blasters from the CV-43 USS Coral Sea)
Supporting force:
8 SEAD F/A-18A Hornet (VMFA-314 Black Knights, VMFA-323 Death Rattlers from the CV-43 USS Coral Sea)
2 SEAD A-7E Corsair-II (VA-46 Clansmen, VA-72 Blue Hawks from the CV-66 USS America)
6 CAP F/A-18A Hornet (VFA-131 Wildcats, VFA-132 Privateers from the CV-43 USS Coral Sea)
3 ECM EA-6B Prowler (VAQ-135 Rooks, VMAQ-2 Playboys from both carriers)
1 SIGINT EA-3B Skywarrior (VQ-2 Sandeman from the CV-43 USS Coral Sea)
2 AWACS E-2C Hawkeye (VAW-127 Seabats from the CV-43 USS Coral Sea)
S-75M3 Volkhov
00:03:29, A-7E Corsair-II, VA-46 Clansmen launched AGM-88 HARM missile.
00:03:42, SNR knocked out by HARM.
Total, SNR On Air Time: 28sec Shooting the Habu with Dvina will bee seen as easy money...
Last edited by Hpasp; 02/07/12 04:59 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 123
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 123 |
hi!  may be some best HABU SR-71 site Be careful max2012, habu may make you sick  .. then you need doctor ..  in this snowy weather .. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 123
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 123 |
this question for Hpasp!
when using Narrow beam, in volhov, and using sector search,
exactly how many degree scan the beam in vertical and in horizontal move,
it seems no more than 5�, true ?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 481
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 481 |
I do not understand why the warning!
When still no "Operation El Dorado Canyon," and do not know when it will do.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 481
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 481 |
I do not understand why the caution!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,046
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,046 |
Hahahaaa!!! "Blackbird" for dinner!  261/59 batterie
13:45 19th of December, 1972.
SR-71 bomb damage assessment flight number one.
SA-75M Dvina
33:51, V-750VMVK 11DMVK Missile launched on Channel-1
Target distance: 76km
Target azimuth: 182�
Target elevation: 18�
Target altitude: 24,2km
SNR mode: 110km
Missile guidance method: UPR (Half Lead)
33:57, V-750VMVK 11DMVK Missile launched on Channel-2
Target distance: 76km
Target azimuth: 181�
Target elevation: 19�
Target altitude: 26km
SNR mode: 110km
Missile guidance method: UPR (Half Lead)
34:05, V-750VMVK 11DMVK Missile launched on Channel-3
Target distance: 76km
Target azimuth: 180�
Target elevation: 21�
Target altitude: 28,5km
SNR mode: 110km
Missile guidance method: K (Half Lead Elevated By Constans)
34:45, Missile exploded on Channel-1
SR-71 Habu hit by SAM. (miss distance: 144m)
34:53, Missile exploded on Channel-3
SR-71 Habu killed by SAM. (miss distance: 42m)
39:03, V-750VMVK 11DMVK Missile launched on Channel-1
Target distance: 9km
Target azimuth: 282�
Target elevation: 60�
Target altitude: 8,6km
SNR mode: 55km
Missile guidance method: UPR (Half Lead)
39:14, V-750VMVK 11DMVK Missile launched on Channel-2
Target distance: 9km
Target azimuth: 282�
Target elevation: 57�
Target altitude: 7,6km
SNR mode: 55km
Missile guidance method: UPR (Half Lead)
39:19, Missile exploded on Channel-1
SR-71 Habu killed by SAM. (miss distance: 3m)
39:26, V-750VMVK 11DMVK Missile launched on Channel-3
Target distance: 8km
Target azimuth: 282�
Target elevation: 53�
Target altitude: 6,5km
SNR mode: 55km
Missile guidance method: UPR (Half Lead)
39:29, Missile exploded on Channel-2
SR-71 Habu killed by SAM. (miss distance: 26m)
39:40, Missile exploded on Channel-3
SR-71 Habu killed by SAM. (miss distance: 17m)
Total, SNR On Air Time: 5min 5sec
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,046
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,046 |
Some addition of "hacking method K"...
This guidance method is simply UPR, just adding a Constant "K" into elevation, depending the distance of the missile to the range boresight.
If the missile - boresight distance is larger than 10km, it adds 1.2 degree to the elevation boresight.
From 10km, it gradually reduces this Constant to 0 degree. (at 5km it is 0.6 degree)
This is important information, thank you! Seems that in ver. 923.0, in jamming enviroment, K became like T/T with 1.2 degrees, and UPR is just like T/T. Still they react on distance boresight. If UPR is based on real target speed, and not angular speed of the target against SNR,I believe that UPR/K behavior in 923.3 is WRONG due to denial of speed and parameter information due to active jaming and must be corrected.
Last edited by piston79; 02/07/12 07:24 PM. Reason: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665 |
this question for Hpasp!
when using Narrow beam, in volhov, and using sector search,
exactly how many degree scan the beam in vertical and in horizontal move,
it seems no more than 5�, true ?That is a special target search method, developed against stealth targets. (As far as I remember, it was not discussed before.) This method is called "Elliptical Search", and by using it, you can search a 5�x 5� area with the increased power output of the Narrow Beam.
Last edited by Hpasp; 02/08/12 07:35 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665 |
Hahahaaa!!! "Blackbird" for dinner!Congratulation! (I think, that the second salvo was against the Geneva Convention...)
|
|
|
J-B Weld
by Terl9999 - 10/02/26 11:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOA's
by Terl9999 - 09/18/26 04:12 AM
|
|
|
|
