SimHQ
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rating: 5
Hop To
Page 9 of 106 1 2 … 7 8 9 10 11 … 105 106
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,904
T
Senior Member
Senior Member
T Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,904
Oh no!
Crop has doth called me a troll!

I put forth an opinion, and Crop must slash it down! Oh crop. what shall I do? Ottowa Joe, please spare me.

Normally, this is the response you'd expect from someone that has run out of ammunition to debate with.

Kinda typical playbook style, eh, Crop?

Get off my leg, man. Either play ball or get off the field.


My personal licensing agreement: In exchange for my hard-earned cash for your product, you agree to the following terms: No part of my hardware may be used as a mechanism to verify or reverify my economical patronage. My receipt will serve that purpose. If you disagree with this license, you may return my money to me, and I'll return your product. \:\)
Inline advert (2nd and 3rd post)

Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,904
T
Senior Member
Senior Member
T Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,904
I'm REALLY tired of dealing with people like you... on all forums.

You get banned from just about every forum you attempt to join... and it's ALWAYS for the same reasons. It's sort of entertaining at first, but after a while it just becomes really really tiresome. I mean the physical kind of tiresome. Where one makes themselves dizzy shaking their head at the antics.

Pepole call your bluff, and you just kind of back away. Why is that, Croppy? $100 is yours to grasp. You started this by your response.

I'm going to get in the habit of responding to replies put forth by you. The constant "backing away" I hope establishes the pattern.

Right or wrong, I will always respond to people like you.


My personal licensing agreement: In exchange for my hard-earned cash for your product, you agree to the following terms: No part of my hardware may be used as a mechanism to verify or reverify my economical patronage. My receipt will serve that purpose. If you disagree with this license, you may return my money to me, and I'll return your product. \:\)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,046
C
Hotshot
Hotshot
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,046
Quote:
Originally posted by Tolwyn:
This product will NEVER see the light of day.
Quote:
Originally posted by Tolwyn:
I'm REALLY tired of dealing with people like you... on all forums.

All people are fed up with dealing with people with the likes of YOU!

Go look at your original post in this thread. A one line zinger with no point or or reason for your comment.

Then you post this payola troll

Quote:
Originally posted by Tolwyn:
Unfortunately yes.
I'd bet GOOD money on it.
Again you post a comment with no reason or point

And I called your bluff on it

Then you repost with conditions on your bet

Get lost loser troll.

SimHQ is NOT CWoS.

BTW your preformance in this thread shows all what you really are....

http://www.simhq.com/simhq3/sims/boards/bbs/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=144;t=001612;p=7

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
If it is anywhere near the quality of IL2 series I will buy it.....there is little competition in the WWI flight sim area. A WWI mod of CFS3 should be out long before then but I'm thinking it may be as buggy as the original....hope not.

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,170
H
Senior Member
Senior Member
H Offline
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,170


Charter member of the FanATIcal nVidiots Society of Uranus
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 13,367
F
Veteran
Veteran
F Offline
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 13,367
Quote:
Originally posted by tAA_Double_Tap:
Wow, this is the best news I have heard in ages. A marriage of the IL-2 engine and WW1 is bound to be a great success.
I still refuse to get excited till I see the bloodied sheet in the morning. WW1 has been left blubering at the alter too many times.

=FB=VikS and Co. I wish you every success. Try not to please everyone. If you listen carefully you can hear the wind being sucked in while people draw breath to announce their 'must have' inclusions. Hell knows I have my list ready to fire. Stay focused. Remember Aesop's fable of the men and the donkey. ;\)
Let's just ignore the last couple of postings, before izan's...

Double-tap, those are wise words indeed: it is very true that the development team should stick to their ideas and aspirations. That is definitely the basis for getting a product out of the door.

As for the campaign system. I don't think the WWI scenario really begs for moving frontlines, etc. Of course some progress in a pilot career, etc, but I don't see that drastic improvements over Il-2FB are needed in this aspect.

There are other subtle ways to improve immersion; music, cut scenes, etc, but I really want a great flying sim, not an interactive movie. My imagination takes well care of that! \:\)


My Il-2 CoD movie web site: www.flightsimvids.com
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 275
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 275
Fokker Dr.I can outturn everything !

...and I want a Junkers J1 for ground attack !

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 697
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 697
I'm sorry to hear that the sim-date planned for start is 1916 - I was looking forward to aiming my Webley with the mouse \:D - if you can score a PK, you are HOT stuff !

Eindekkers would have been nice, but I'll greedily take any WWI fix that comes my way - and based on IL2 means it will be starting from a baseline of "very very good".


"Another glass of your loathsome, vaguely beerish frozen swill, if you please."
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 13,367
F
Veteran
Veteran
F Offline
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 13,367
It makes sense to begin with 1916-18, since the yanks will be there and the planes will have higher performance. With pre-1916 planes, some people might be shocked to have to nurse early-war planes around the sky in feeble turns and dives, to keep them from falling apart (which they did!).


My Il-2 CoD movie web site: www.flightsimvids.com
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,118
K
Veteran
Veteran
K Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,118
Quote:
Originally posted by Freycinet:
It makes sense to begin with 1916-18, since the yanks will be there and the planes will have higher performance. With pre-1916 planes, some people might be shocked to have to nurse early-war planes around the sky in feeble turns and dives, to keep them from falling apart (which they did!).
I think people will be shocked anyways. Try flying the biplanes we now have around the sky at ~100mph.

The Camel with the Clerget 140hp motor took 8.5 minutes to reach 10,000ft and 15.75 minutes to reach 15,000ft.

The above from Chaz Boyer's Sopwith Camel - King of Combat. ISBN 0-946627-49-5


There was only 16 squadrons of RAF fighters that used 100 octane during the BoB.
The Fw190A could not fly with the outer cannon removed.
There was no Fw190A-8s flying with the JGs in 1945.
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,904
T
Senior Member
Senior Member
T Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,904
No conditions, Crop.
Just location-centric. I'm from the US. It will never see the light of day in the US. Much like the possibility the russian addons will not see the light of day... in the US.

Not a condition, just being a bit more specific. If THAT is what you're holding on to for dear life, I'm sad for you.

If you'd like to have the bet without the condition, that's fine. \:\) I'll offer it. NOW are you interested?

PS: Light of day means as a bona fide product. Not a tech demo or something equally mundane.

I'm not bluffing. I've offered now 3 times for you to take my friendly wager, and you won't. And my first post you assigned the tone to it, would it have helped if I put in a smiley?

You do know what sarcasm paired with cynicism and reverse psychology mean, right?

\:D


My personal licensing agreement: In exchange for my hard-earned cash for your product, you agree to the following terms: No part of my hardware may be used as a mechanism to verify or reverify my economical patronage. My receipt will serve that purpose. If you disagree with this license, you may return my money to me, and I'll return your product. \:\)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,494
P
Member
Member
P Offline
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,494
The purity of it (WWI flying) is the biggest attraction for me.

It's already been said, but WWI aircraft are probably more suited to computer gaming (IMO).

Lower closing velocities = more time between seeing just a dot and getting to a merge - Being able to see the other guy's aspect earlier to maneuver against him.

Hope it's got full Track IR support too.

I'd guess skipping 1915 is also to avoid the Eindecker - the whining from the other side might be non-stop during the Fokker Scourge.

\:D Papa_K

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 940
R
Member
Member
R Offline
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 940
Well, besides the WWI sim being discussed here, Over Flanders Field mod ( http://www.off.oldbrowndog.net/index.htm ), and TK's effort ( http://bbs.thirdwire.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=2003 ), there is also this one in the works too: http://www.d-strict.com/

Looks like some great WWI goodness ahead! \:D

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 802
D
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 802
LMAO at Slap!

Dude, have you noticed that you are the only one that is nekid?

OK, somebody else get nekid to make Slap feel better ... OK, thanks for helping Ming.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 13,367
F
Veteran
Veteran
F Offline
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 13,367
'kay, I'm in!


My Il-2 CoD movie web site: www.flightsimvids.com
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,357
D
Hotshot
Hotshot
D Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,357
Tolwyn, Crop

knock it off, or take it to PMs please


XBL : DUDE163
PSN : DUDE163
http://www.flickr.com/photos/riverviewfoto/
http://dude163.blogspot.com (vintage lens foto blog)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 126
R
Member
Member
R Offline
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 126
With OFF, Third Wire and GT all in the WW1 game I'm feeling pretty good about one, some, or all making it to the finish line. If they all do... I will support them all. Still one of my most memorable moments in computer gaming was the first time I played RB. There is just something about the up close and personal dance of WW1 dogfight

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Quote:
Originally posted by Freycinet:
Also, the flyable SPAD XIII should come in very handy, plane-wise.
Man, I can hear it from the t&b'ers already... "oh sure, run away b&z woosies... why not come back and turn fight me like a real man" ;\)

Still... can't wait.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,718
Measured in Llamathrusts
Lifer
Measured in Llamathrusts
Lifer
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,718
I'm in.

All the fun of WWI with the FM fidelity of the IL-2 series? Yeah, baby!

Not being a serious FM sort of fellow, so long as the Camel has wicked torque, a blipping engine, the Snipe good maneuverability (but not a lot of power) and the DH-2 lives up to it's name as the "whirling incenerator" I'm happy.

Red Baron was the first sim that really, really interested me, and Red Bareon 3D (RB3D) completely captured me for a couple of years, especially since online play became reasonable right about the time it hit it's prime.

The upsides of RB3D were the online play, the fun of WWI, and - above all else - the online community that came with it. Indeed, I flew the sim for the last six months not because it was fun so much as I didn't want to let go of the great friends I made there. Indeed, the BA in my nick here is from those days when I was an RFC 101 "Black Adder."

The downsides was the open FM/DM, and the technology getting away from Glide. I'm not disparaging the fine work done by the community one bit, but I suffered greatly from FM confusion towards the end, which sucked the joy out of flying for me. Am I flying NFM (Normal Flight Model), Flanders in Flames (FiF), or the Great War flight model? Add in that every tourney tended to have an improved FM/DM, and one could find oneself flying a new sim every six months or so (or flying multiple FM's simultaneously).

Add in the 'hit box' DM (which was very cool for the time the sim was made), and I found myself trying to "sim the sim." Indeed, more than one RB3D'er that tried IL-2 out was shocked to find that I, the worst virtual pilot in WWI (validated, as I was dead last in the individual rankings of a major tournament two years running), could shoot them down, while they shot at my wingtips where the hit boxes would "normally" be and got bupkiss.

I can't stress enough how the failings were mine, not the community's (or even the sim's), as it is still around and kicking.

I had a whale of a good time with RB3D, and would love to fly the WWI skies again in a more modern simulation.


The opinions of this poster are largely based on facts and portray a possible version of the actual events.

More dumb stuff at http://www.darts-page.com

From Laser:
"The forum is the place where combat (real time) flight simulator fans come to play turn based strategy combat."
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,976
H
Member
Member
H Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,976
Looking forward to a WWI sim on the IL2 engine. I only buy hardware for WWI flight sims. Without RB3D, I'd have never bothered with EAW, WW2Fighters, Rowan's BoB, etc. So by giving me WWI, you just might sell a copy of Oleg's BoB too! \:D

I'd rather not have Starforce on the CD though. ;\)

Page 9 of 106 1 2 … 7 8 9 10 11 … 105 106

Moderated by  RacerGT, Wklink 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Quick Search
Recent Articles
Support SimHQ

If you shop on Amazon use this Amazon link to support SimHQ
.
Social


Recent Topics
Cydonia Mars
by Terl9999 - 10/01/26 07:22 AM
Steam vs GOG
by Terl9999 - 09/30/26 09:04 PM
It has been a long absence
by Snow46 - 09/30/26 07:36 PM
SpaceX Starship Going to Orbit
by F4UDash4 - 09/28/26 12:37 PM
God Forbid they want to have a bit of fun at work
by NoFlyBoy - 09/22/26 08:50 PM
How a 5" 38 Caliber US Naval Gun Works
by F4UDash4 - 09/19/26 01:20 AM
100% commission based sales
by PanzerMeyer - 09/18/26 04:47 PM
Relativity
by Terl9999 - 09/18/26 04:34 AM
HOA's
by Terl9999 - 09/18/26 04:12 AM
Football
by Terl9999 - 09/18/26 02:42 AM
Popular Topics(Views)
7,076,012 SAM Simulator
Copyright 1997-2016, SimHQ Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1