|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 297
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 297 |
Ghost, yes. (As long as it is actually finished at that time.) Please verify that you have access to the backer section on our forum. If this is not the case, please PM Groove ( http://forums.eagle.ru/member.php?u=4015 ) and he will sort you.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 100
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 100 |
Thanks for the fast answer. I just post here, because, Matt write: No discussion!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 779
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 779 |
Good riddance luthier.
His involvement was always my main reservation about this project.
Now he's gone I don't really care about the money.
I think we are owed an explanation of what happened but.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 142
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 142 |
A interesting update, wags update them..... Because there are some shared resources between projects (like cockpit systems programming), there will be some impact to our other projects. However, because much of the former RRG team is now employed by Eagle Dynamics, the impact on other Eagle projects will be minimal. goodbye modern warfare? 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 297
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 297 |
Thanks for the fast answer. I just post here, because, Matt write: No discussion! We won't discuss what lead to this state of affairs. But we will most certainly "discuss" (so to speak) what you need to get what you have paid for. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 297
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 297 |
I think we are owed an explanation of what happened but. Please understand that however much we may want to "talk", we are unable. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,705
Asleep at the Wheel Member
|
|
Asleep at the Wheel Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,705 |
I think its unfortunate that another year minimum has been tacked on to this project That assumes that Luthier was ever going to deliver the project on time in the first place. That was always a major question mark - even more so now. The good news is that we now have a significantly better chance of actually getting our hands on this sim AND at an ED level of quality. All in all, I see this as a massive win. My only reservation is the extra strain on ED's finite finances. Hopefully they're not overextending themselves.
--------- Pizzicato
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 490
ED Community Manager Member
|
|
ED Community Manager Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 490 |
Sounds like ED hired his team out from underneath him. Sounds nothing like that...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,705
Asleep at the Wheel Member
|
|
Asleep at the Wheel Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,705 |
Sounds like ED hired his team out from underneath him. Sounds nothing like that... Ha! Yeah, I was going to say the exact same thing. 
--------- Pizzicato
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 779
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 779 |
Wondering what has happened to the kickstarter cash?
Is DCS now picking up the cost of funding this whole project to protect their good name?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 427
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 427 |
Given that the Kickstarter cash was supposed to fund development - i.e. pay wages etc - I suspect most of it has been spent.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 779
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 779 |
Given that the Kickstarter cash was supposed to fund development - i.e. pay wages etc - I suspect most of it has been spent. Has it? Given what's gone on I don't think some transparency would go amiss. What wage did Luthier pay himself out of the funds raised for example?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 427
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 427 |
Have you ever seen developers discussing such things in public?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,943
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,943 |
What wage did Luthier pay himself out of the funds raised for example?
The only person to ask is Luthier.... Nate
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,705
Asleep at the Wheel Member
|
|
Asleep at the Wheel Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,705 |
Given that the Kickstarter cash was supposed to fund development - i.e. pay wages etc - I suspect most of it has been spent. According to Luthier, the cash was actually supposed to be used for an extended period of polish. That made sense to me in that $150,000 is a pretty trivial amount of money in game development.
--------- Pizzicato
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 779
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 779 |
What wage did Luthier pay himself out of the funds raised for example?
The only person to ask is Luthier.... Nate Well that's what I'm asking. Do we know if DCS is effectively funding this project out of their own pocket? I trust that if there are irregularities here the appropriate avenues are being pursued.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 77
Junior Member
|
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 77 |
goodbye modern warfare? Look at it from the bright side, you'll be getting dozens of WW2 warbirds in the next year or so. Ohh, you don't like them? You've been supporting ED for a long time and have been buying every product so far, even the stand-alone rehashes of FCx, even if you don't fly them, just because you've hoped for a new DCS modern jet? Well too bad mister, better learn to love propeller planes, because you'll be getting a lot of them.
Last edited by Penguran; 06/08/14 06:59 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 142
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 142 |
goodbye modern warfare? Look at it from the bright side, you'll be getting dozens of WW2 warbirds in the next year or so. Ohh, you don't like them? You've been supporting ED for a long time and have been buying every product so far, even the stand-alone rehashes of FCx, even if you don't fly them, just because you've hoped for a new DCS modern jet? Well too bad mister, better learn to love propeller planes, because you'll be getting a lot of them. Fortunately as a virtual viperdriver I do not have to wait until DCS will produce something modern again. I also have never bought a FC aircraft or other aircraft which I am not interested in (P51). DCS going ww2 just means that I can save my money while enjoying my f16 sim. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 29
Junior Member
|
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 29 |
Remember the PFM flanker update is on its way. So don't be hasty about ED going into WW2 aircraft only. We also have the Mig 21 on the way.
aka "aquarius_varun" ------------------------------------------------- ∟ояď of tђє תẵΖğύl
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 77
Junior Member
|
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 77 |
Remember the PFM flanker update is on its way. So don't be hasty about ED going into WW2 aircraft only. We also have the Mig 21 on the way. New flight models are not new content. F-15, Su-27, A-10A, Mig-29 and Su-25 have been around since 2003 and they use the same avionics as they did 11 years ago. They are not new or interesting in any way. The stand-alone titles of FC planes are the fifth (5!!) incarnation of the old Lomac planes. In 11 years, we didn't get a single new modern air-frame in this series. Just remakes, derivatives and upgrades of the same old line-up. Now they've been teasing us with F-18C for 3 years and now we get to hear that they'll focus on WW2 birds first... That's horrible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOA's
by Terl9999 - 09/18/26 04:12 AM
|
Football
by Terl9999 - 09/18/26 02:42 AM
|
Flags
by Terl9999 - 09/15/26 10:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|