SimHQ
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Page 148 of 176 1 2 … 146 147 148 149 150 … 175 176
Hpasp #3587039 06/06/12 11:02 AM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,044
P
Member
Member
P Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,044
Quote:
I tried to do some tests with calucalted missile position (EPSILON PR. P. BETA switch in A screen) but no luck.
I noticed missiles deviate at at target also in azimuth.


The only way is to be able to use UPR/K, or shoot at a predicted point of the target's path (precise timming is a must!). As I posted earlier, the maximum parameter for a succesfull shot with V-755 missile is 20.5 km for target at 20 km.
Click to reveal..
Strange that UPR/K methods doesn't work on 187/V (no matther that it calculates speed/parameter and heigh of the target, as it is obviouse on |Q| screen). Using IADS, as a some kind "antijamming" tool also doesn't work as we do not have fuul info on |Q| screen about target, so - no UPR possible.

Anyway, in reality T/T mode is very limited against SR-71, so even what we do now is just a fiction...:
Click to reveal..

Quote:
From which base do you shoot? I am at the most eastern one.


Both... No luck at all...

Last edited by piston79; 06/06/12 04:32 PM.
Inline advert (2nd and 3rd post)

Hpasp #3587044 06/06/12 11:27 AM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 636
Likes: 1
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 636
Likes: 1
I will try UPR or T/T to a preset range at about 50km (the closest point of SR-71 and maximum range of missiles) and shoot at about 100km. Maybe with a K3 fuse setting.
I will post results here.

piston79 #3587055 06/06/12 11:57 AM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 203
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 203
Originally Posted By: piston79
Originally Posted By: Lonewolf357
By using I87V. It is pretty accurate against high-altitude targets.


I think it is pretty accurate against NON-MANEUVERING targets, no matter the heigh... thumbsup


Indeed. But engaging even non-maneuvering jamming target that flies at low altitude is a big problem.

Hpasp #3587096 06/06/12 02:01 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 636
Likes: 1
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 636
Likes: 1
After analyzing many 3DAAR's I think there is a THEORETICAL chance to hit it with a conventional warhead, but I do not think it is achievable otherways than with a lots of luck :-)

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
H
Senior Member
Senior Member
H Offline
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Originally Posted By: Alien_MasterMynd
Lonewolf: How have you managed to kill the SR-71 with a nuclear warhead? It is jamming so you do not have range information and V-760 15D requires K3 detonation. How SNR would know when to send K3 (while you are unable to track in range)?


Using 15D should not be an issue...


... sorry, but all physical evidence of the hit was vaporized.
explode


Hpasp
Free SAM Simulator, "Realistic to the Switch"

(U-2 over Sverdlovsk, B-52's over Hanoi, F-4 Phantoms over the Sinai, F-16's and the F-117A Stealth bomber over the Balkans.)
http://sites.google.com/site/samsimulator1972/home

Book from the author - Soviet Nuclear Weapons in Hungary 1961-1991
https://sites.google.com/view/nuclear-weapons-in-hungary/

thumbsup
Hpasp #3587190 06/06/12 04:30 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 636
Likes: 1
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 636
Likes: 1
Hpasp: I have already achieved it with a nuclear warhead :-) With a conventional in the moment of detonation target was too far :-(

Hpasp #3587400 06/06/12 09:16 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,361
L
Senior Member
Senior Member
L Offline
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,361
The hit shown by HPasp would have been lethal with 'only' the large conventional warhead.

Hpasp #3587419 06/06/12 09:46 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,044
P
Member
Member
P Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,044
Hi guys, is anybody knew what's that?
Click to reveal..

Here, a nice workplace wink :
Click to reveal..

Last edited by piston79; 06/08/12 04:47 AM.
piston79 #3587617 06/07/12 07:55 AM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
H
Senior Member
Senior Member
H Offline
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Originally Posted By: piston79
Hi guys, is anybody knew what's that?
Click to reveal..




IFF Interrogator, (NATO Codename: Score Board)

Last edited by Hpasp; 06/07/12 12:46 PM.

Hpasp
Free SAM Simulator, "Realistic to the Switch"

(U-2 over Sverdlovsk, B-52's over Hanoi, F-4 Phantoms over the Sinai, F-16's and the F-117A Stealth bomber over the Balkans.)
http://sites.google.com/site/samsimulator1972/home

Book from the author - Soviet Nuclear Weapons in Hungary 1961-1991
https://sites.google.com/view/nuclear-weapons-in-hungary/

thumbsup
piston79 #3587698 06/07/12 12:52 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
H
Senior Member
Senior Member
H Offline
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Originally Posted By: piston79

Here, a nice workplace wink :
Click to reveal..



Bit too much safety stamp, for my taste...

BR.I-II-III is OK to be blocked in peacetime...
...but blocking the RPK-ANT switch, and the BR button is seems to be a little over cautious approach to me!!!
biggrin

Last edited by Hpasp; 06/07/12 03:27 PM.

Hpasp
Free SAM Simulator, "Realistic to the Switch"

(U-2 over Sverdlovsk, B-52's over Hanoi, F-4 Phantoms over the Sinai, F-16's and the F-117A Stealth bomber over the Balkans.)
http://sites.google.com/site/samsimulator1972/home

Book from the author - Soviet Nuclear Weapons in Hungary 1961-1991
https://sites.google.com/view/nuclear-weapons-in-hungary/

thumbsup
Hpasp #3587917 06/07/12 07:40 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
H
Senior Member
Senior Member
H Offline
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Just a nasty comment about "Speed Bumps"...

I heard about a fighter pilot, who evaded a Dvina (SA-2F) missile above Vietnam...
... I heard about a fighter pilot, who evaded a Neva (SA-3B) missile above the Sinai...
... I heard about a fighter pilot, who evaded a Vega (SA-5B) missile above the Gulf of Sidra...

... but...

I never heard about a fighter pilot, who could successfully avoid a mistakenly fired Patriot Missile, and...
... never heard about a one, who faced the S-300P in real war.

rolleyes

Last edited by Hpasp; 06/07/12 07:41 PM.

Hpasp
Free SAM Simulator, "Realistic to the Switch"

(U-2 over Sverdlovsk, B-52's over Hanoi, F-4 Phantoms over the Sinai, F-16's and the F-117A Stealth bomber over the Balkans.)
http://sites.google.com/site/samsimulator1972/home

Book from the author - Soviet Nuclear Weapons in Hungary 1961-1991
https://sites.google.com/view/nuclear-weapons-in-hungary/

thumbsup
Hpasp #3587950 06/07/12 08:55 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,044
P
Member
Member
P Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,044
Originally Posted By: Hpasp

Bit too much safety stamp, for my taste...

BR.I-II-III is OK to be blocked in peacetime...
...but blocking the RPK-ANT switch, and the BR button is seems to be a little over cautious approach to me!!!
biggrin


I was told that RPK-ANT is sealed because of radiosilence... Probably "BR" is about that also, because with it and "75 km" mode on, transmition is on the air too...

Quote:
Just a nasty comment about "Speed Bumps"...

Dear Hpasp, don't take so seriouse this "Speed bump" issue... It's just a cocky behaviour of the fly boys... wink
Personally for me, the succsesfull air defence organization is a mix of SA type missiles and fighters, joined with an efective IADS system... Air power never achieved a victory in a war on it's own alone. If the SAM's were so useless, they never will be developed at all... So, end of story! thumbsup

Last edited by piston79; 06/07/12 09:07 PM.
Hpasp #3587988 06/07/12 10:42 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,893
G
Hotshot
Hotshot
G Offline
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,893
There is very little information about those incidents, however, the engagement distances were quite short, and it is quite probable that all involved aircraft were at cruising rather than combat speed. That's a very poor position to be attacked in - not much you can do in the time given.

... did you hear about the F-16 that stuck a HARM in a Patriot, though? I guess that doesn't -really- count as evasion.

Originally Posted By: Hpasp
I never heard about a fighter pilot, who could successfully avoid a mistakenly fired Patriot Missile, and...
... never heard about a one, who faced the S-300P in real war.


--
44th VFW
piston79 #3587989 06/07/12 10:43 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,893
G
Hotshot
Hotshot
G Offline
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,893
Actually it did ... at least twice in history that I am aware of, but the first time SAMs did not exist yet.

Originally Posted By: piston79
Air power never achieved a victory in a war on it's own alone. If the SAM's were so useless, they never will be developed at all... So, end of story! thumbsup


--
44th VFW
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,044
P
Member
Member
P Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,044
Hi,
Which wars you have in mind?
Could you be more specific?

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
H
Senior Member
Senior Member
H Offline
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Originally Posted By: GrayGhost
There is very little information about those incidents, however, the engagement distances were quite short, and it is quite probable that all involved aircraft were at cruising rather than combat speed. That's a very poor position to be attacked in - not much you can do in the time given.

... did you hear about the F-16 that stuck a HARM in a Patriot, though? I guess that doesn't -really- count as evasion.




Good argument thumbsup, probably the AN/TLQ-32 was not operated...

SAM's always performed better than MiGs.
SAM's were able to shot down U2's, B-52's, F-16's, F-117, while these plane types were never shot down by a MiG.

Last edited by Hpasp; 06/08/12 07:35 AM.

Hpasp
Free SAM Simulator, "Realistic to the Switch"

(U-2 over Sverdlovsk, B-52's over Hanoi, F-4 Phantoms over the Sinai, F-16's and the F-117A Stealth bomber over the Balkans.)
http://sites.google.com/site/samsimulator1972/home

Book from the author - Soviet Nuclear Weapons in Hungary 1961-1991
https://sites.google.com/view/nuclear-weapons-in-hungary/

thumbsup
Hpasp #3588192 06/08/12 07:53 AM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 636
Likes: 1
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 636
Likes: 1
Hi Hpasp, please look at this AAR - hit by a nuclear blast and immediatelly folowing killed by a nuclear blast without time and description.

Click to reveal..
9:20am 15th of April, 1986.
SR-71 bomb damage assessment flight.

S-75M3 Volkhov


00:01:18, V-760 15D Missile launched on Channel-1
Target distance: 110km
Target azimuth: 71�
Target elevation: 11�
Target altitude: 22,3km
SNR mode: Wide Beam - 150km
Missile guidance method: T/T (Three Point)


00:01:23, V-760 15D Missile launched on Channel-2
Target distance: 106km
Target azimuth: 71�
Target elevation: 12�
Target altitude: 22,3km
SNR mode: Wide Beam - 150km
Missile guidance method: T/T (Three Point)


00:01:32, V-760 15D Missile launched on Channel-3
Target distance: 98km
Target azimuth: 69�
Target elevation: 13�
Target altitude: 22,3km
SNR mode: Wide Beam - 150km
Missile guidance method: T/T (Three Point)


00:02:30, V-760 15D Missile launched on Channel-1
Target distance: 54km
Target azimuth: 50�
Target elevation: 24�
Target altitude: 22,3km
SNR mode: Wide Beam - 150km
Missile guidance method: T/T (Three Point)


00:02:35, Missile exploded on Channel-2
SR-71 Tromp-30 hit by nuclear blast. (distance from epicenter: 2716m)
killed by nuclear blast. (distance from epicenter: 3724m)

00:02:49, V-760 15D Missile launched on Channel-2
Target distance: 46km
Target azimuth: 34�
Target elevation: 28�
Target altitude: 22,3km
SNR mode: Wide Beam - 150km
Missile guidance method: T/T (Three Point)


00:02:55, V-760 15D Missile launched on Channel-3
Target distance: 44km
Target azimuth: 28�
Target elevation: 30�
Target altitude: 22,3km
SNR mode: Wide Beam - 150km
Missile guidance method: T/T (Three Point)


00:03:21, Missile exploded on Channel-1

00:03:37, Missile exploded on Channel-2

Hpasp #3588194 06/08/12 07:55 AM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 636
Likes: 1
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 636
Likes: 1
After looking at 3DAAR it is clear. The killed thing without a description is my second missile :-)

Hpasp #3588203 06/08/12 08:20 AM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 68
V
Junior Member
Junior Member
V Offline
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 68
I think of SAMs more of a wall (if used properly) than a speed bump. biggrin

Hpasp #3588209 06/08/12 08:58 AM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 203
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 203
Originally Posted By: Hpasp

Good argument thumbsup, probably the AN/TLQ-32 was not operated...


Hmm, my 2004 Jane's radars and electronic warfare systems says following:

"The AN/TLQ-32 ARM-D was selected by the US Air Force (USAF) in March 1989, with a then year US$11.6 million contract for two `first article' examples being awarded during the following September. Testing of these began in May 1992 and full-scale production of 14 systems to protect USAF AN/TPS-75 radars began in December 1992. During 1996, additional TLQ-32 systems were delivered to the US Air National Guard"

Neither USAF nor Air National Guard operates the Patriots, Army does...

Page 148 of 176 1 2 … 146 147 148 149 150 … 175 176

Moderated by  RacerGT 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Quick Search
Recent Articles
Support SimHQ

If you shop on Amazon use this Amazon link to support SimHQ
.
Social


Recent Topics
God Forbid they want to have a bit of fun at work
by NoFlyBoy - 09/22/26 08:50 PM
How a 5" 38 Caliber US Naval Gun Works
by F4UDash4 - 09/19/26 01:20 AM
100% commission based sales
by PanzerMeyer - 09/18/26 04:47 PM
Relativity
by Terl9999 - 09/18/26 04:34 AM
HOA's
by Terl9999 - 09/18/26 04:12 AM
Football
by Terl9999 - 09/18/26 02:42 AM
Flags
by Terl9999 - 09/15/26 10:03 PM
September 15th Battle of Britain Day.
by RedToo - 09/15/26 08:06 PM
Population Patterns
by PanzerMeyer - 09/15/26 03:43 PM
"Problem occurred in connection"
by F4UDash4 - 09/14/26 01:41 PM
Popular Topics(Views)
7,068,667 SAM Simulator
Copyright 1997-2016, SimHQ Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1