Add murder to her long questionable character resume already!
Now, THINK 1912. Morals were different then.
Here's her resume:
1. TRAMP: she slept with a man out of wedlock.
2. LIAR: she had the necklace all the time those 84 years (Titanic sank in 1912, the current times scenes were set in 1996).
3. CHEATER: she cheated on her fiancee.
4. LIAR AGAIN: she told Jack I will never let you go and she let go of his frozen stiff dead body to sink to the bottom of the cold ocean so she could save herself.
5. SELFISH: there was plenty room on that floating wooden door for both of them, she was all warm and cozy and dry on it while poor Jack was shivering cold in the freezing water and slowly dying.
MYTHBUSTERS proved it:
Jack was better off dead than surviving the sinking and spending the rest of his life with her. So was the fiancee, good thing he off himself. In those days women who cheat were sluts especially Rose who was bethrothed and engaged to nobility so her and her mother would not starve to death as paupers.
6. MURDERER: She was laying on the wooden door and singing while staring at the stars and then she push Jack away without checking him first.
My problem with Rose as I recall, is that she tossed that fortune of a rock overboard at the end. The nice research dude spent all that time and money looking for it, and she didn't even let him see it. Not to mention it could have been part of her granddaughter's inheritance.
The rusty wire that holds the cork that keeps the anger in Gives way and suddenly it’s day again The sun is in the east Even though the day is done Two suns in the sunset, hmph Could be the human race is run
My problem with Rose as I recall, is that she tossed that fortune of a rock overboard at the end. The nice research dude spent all that time and money looking for it, and she didn't even let him see it. Not to mention it could have been part of her granddaughter's inheritance.
Seriously? This much in-depth analysis for a sappy romance movie released 23 years ago?
“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”
Seriously? This much in-depth analysis for a sappy romance movie released 23 years ago?
Yep.
It's FICTION people.
"In the vast library of socialist books, there’s not a single volume on how to create wealth, only how to take and “redistribute” it.” - David Horowitz
The rusty wire that holds the cork that keeps the anger in Gives way and suddenly it’s day again The sun is in the east Even though the day is done Two suns in the sunset, hmph Could be the human race is run
The movie lost me when they began traversing Arctic cold sea water past their waists in the ship without any sort of physical reaction of any kind.
You mean in the scenes where they were still inside the Titanic while it was sinking and they were running through rising waist deep water in the interior corridors like when Rose rescued Jack after he was handcuffed to a pipe in a cabin?
My problem with Rose as I recall, is that she tossed that fortune of a rock overboard at the end. The nice research dude spent all that time and money looking for it, and she didn't even let him see it. Not to mention it could have been part of her granddaughter's inheritance.
"Also, I would prefer a back seater over the extra gas any day. I would have 80 pounds of flesh to eat and a pair of glasses to start a fire." --F/A-18 Hornet pilot
DCS, F1 2024 and IL-2 Stalingrad/Great Battles for me.
“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”
